‘Prometheus’ Film Review

Prometheus Movie Review by Mike Smith

According to the “Alien” time line, it was June 2122 (about 110 years from now) that the USCSS Nostromo ran into a little trouble.

In 2093 a group of space travelers, led by scientists Elizabeth Shaw (Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) awaken from a deep slumber to find themselves in route to what they hope is the discovery of the century. Their trip financed by the very wealth, but very old, Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce), the reason for this mission comes from the various paintings found on ancient cave wall all over the world. To Elizabeth and Charlie the clues are unmistakable. “I think they want us to come find them,” Elizabeth comments. Maybe…..

Directed with the same master-touch he brought to such films as “Alien,” “Blade Runner,” Thelma and Louise” and “Gladiator” by Ridley Scott, “Prometheus” is a stand-alone film that may or may not have something to do with the “Alien” series. I’m hedging my comments because it’s truly up for the audience to decide Scott’s message to film goers. Co-written by long time “Lost” scribe Damon Lindelof, who also has “Cowboys and Aliens” and the upcoming “Star Trek” film on his list of credits, the story blends horror and mystery perfectly, greatly assisted by some first rate actors.

Fassbender continues his rise to the top of my favorite actors working today with a brilliant portrayal of David, a cyborg creature still trying his best to understand the world around him and the people he serves. Rapace is a revelation as a tougher then she seems character who actually “out-Ripleys” Sigourney Weaver’s character in “Alien.” Though Elizabeth and Charlie are technically in charge of the expedition the real boss is Meridith Vickers (Theron), a woman shrouded in mystery. As played by Theron she is very tough and self-sufficient. Other members of the crew include ship captain Janek (Idris Elba) and his first mate, Ravel (Benedict Wong).

Like with “Alien,” Scott depends on the atmosphere and sets to influence the audience’s emotions. His cameras move briskly through vast caves and hurtle down ship hallways as if he’s leading a roller coaster ride that you can’t catch your breath on. The production design by long time Scott associate and two-time Oscar nominee (“Gladiator,” “American Gangster”) Arthur Max is stunning while the musical score by Marc Streitenfeld helps set the films’ tone.

Starring: Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender and Charlize Theron
Directed by: Ridley Scott
MPAA Rating: R
Running time: 2 hrs 4 mins
20th Century Fox


Universal MEDIA MIKES
SCORE: 4 out of 5 stars

Get all of your movie news, reviews, and awesome interviews at Media Mikes.com: http://MediaMikes.com

Check out the Desk of Brian Facebook page here

About the Author

- Mike A. Smith has been the film critic for the Leavenworth (Kansas) Times since 2002. He has also been the film critic and a featured writer (“Mike’s Rant”) for Nolan’s Pop Culture Review (www.crazedfanboy.com) for more then a decade. He is a weekly contributor to the RottenTomatoes web site and has recently had his reviews featured at www.moviehole.net. He currently serves as Vice President of the Kansas City Film Critics Circle, the second oldest professional film critics’ association in the United States. Smith resides in Lee’s Summit, Missouri. The Mikes both cite “JAWS” as their favorite film and in fact first met at JAWSFest in 2005. They both are featured in the critically acclaimed documentary, “The Shark Is Still Working.”

Displaying 8 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. Brandon says:

    not enough HP Lovecraft to make me mad. If del Toro’s “Pacific Rim” is a success, he can make whatever he wants and the studio will support it. I don’t think many of the fans have ever read Lovecraft, I just think too many were expecting AVP and more explosions

  2. Ter says:

    that being said id didnt hate the movie just wish Del Toros At the Mountains of Madness didnt get shelved beccause of this. which it did.

  3. Ter says:

    so have any of you cerebral sci-fi fans here ever read At The Mountains of Madness? i mean if you did youd realize the complete plagiarization of Lovecrafts novel. yeah yeah im being pretentious but fact is fact.

  4. Nolan says:

    The fans may be thinking it was too cerebral (i.e., talky for too long), the old-age make-up on the Weyland character was horrible (looked like an old man mask from the ’70s), and there was too much emphasis on eye-candy (the 3D version exemplifies this, but does it well.) It did hit on all the familiar marks: the requisite android, the young heroine who outlives everybody, the space jockey, etc., but without truly breaking any new ground. The storyline’s semi-religious allusions to our “creators” has been done before. The plot overlaps Lovecraft’s Cthulhu many times. That said, I did enjoy the movie (surprise) and consider it a worthy prequel to “Alien”. I’m just offering suggestions on why some fans might have been disappointed.

  5. Brandon says:

    As I said, it was great, but you’ll find a ton of negative reviews and disappointed fans that wanted a ton of action, chest bursting etc….that’s not what this film was about

  6. John says:

    I thought it was pretty awesome.

  7. Tsai says:

    Totally agree. It’s better to see it as a different movie.

  8. Brandon says:

    I loved Prometheus, but I do understand why there are so many disappointed fans. This is Alien NOT AlienS

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

http://deskofbrian.com/wp-content/uploads/Monumental-Leaderboard728x90.jpg